North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: NAP/ISP Saturation WAS: Re: Exchanges that matter...
> > The GIGAswitch has theoretical difficulties. Head of line blocking and so > on. But the exchanges that use GIGAswitches aren't having measurable > problems which are traceable to the GIGAswitches. The "O" in NANOG is for > "operations" and in the field of operations, anything that works gets used. Is it the concensus of this group that the "GIGAswitches aren't having measurable problems"? I have recently received messages from the "Operators" at MAE-West that don't seem to support this position. > > There is a conclusion to be drawn from this regarding ATM. > I run an IP/ATM network with which I am happy. Most NSPs either use ATM for transport or are rumored to be moving in that direction. Jim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -