North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Would the list object...
I personally don't object, per se, but I dropped off the inet-access list earlier this year due to the unbearably low signal/noise ratio. If the NANOG list were to become a cacophony as did inet-access, you can scratch this list too. I figure that if anyone on inet-access is interested in the discussion(s) here on NANOG, then they are already subscribed. $.02, - paul At 11:16 PM 12/1/96 -0800, David Carmean wrote: > >I've started expanding the last couple years of the archives of >this list back into hypertext (Hypermail at the moment) so I could >review some of the threads that are more than a couple of months old. > >If I get the OK for the resources from "The Management", would any (many?) >of you object to me making the existence of my unofficial mirror >known to inet-access, etc.? I have some concerns that it might >precipitate off-topic noise on this list, but I also think that it >would be a good resource for those on the steep portion of the >learning curve to understand why things are the way they are, e.g >route filtering, peering restrictions, etc.... > >Thanks > >-- >David Carmean <[email protected]> >Silicon Beach Communications, Santa Barbara, California +1-805-730-7740 > Opinions herein are those of the author only, unless otherwise noted > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|