|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: The Cidr Report
> > This is not to pick on CERFNET but just to highlight a problem of > actually tracking the size of the routing table in general. This > CERFnet case seems to be this way becuase it is a direct peer of > Bill's box even though I can see no reason why the more specifics are > needed. > > Looking a little more it seems a large amount of more specifics are being > announced to Bill's boxe which aren't being announced to the xara.net > router. Perhaps ISPs are taking more care at places like MAE-East with > their outbound filters than they are at Bill's peering point even though > Bill only has 6 active EBGP neighbors and the xara.net router has 39 > ;-(. Apparently true. The specifics leak from one of our CIDR blocks was only being made to Bill's peering point ( otherwise known as MAE-LA or MELEE when first started ;-) ). Being fixed shortly. Thanks On the larger question, it would be difficult to find two places on the net with a consistent view of the global routing table although for trend analysis both MAE East and the Sprint NAP should have a more of a representative view than MAE-LA. --pushpendra Pushpendra Mohta [email protected] +1 619 455 3908 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|