North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Exchanges that matter...
On Fri, 29 Nov 1996, Derek Elder wrote: |} So is there a better solution for someone that doesn't actually want a |} POP there now? If PAIX is the smartest connection facilities wise, |} that is where we want to be. Are 2 DS-3 connections per router allowed |} at PAIX? That would be the best solution -- cohab a router at PAIX, |} DS-3 back to our core and DS-3 up to Pacbell. |} |} What am I missing? Just that you'll have to eat extra circuit costs. While PAIX is a nicer, newer and cleaner facility than what MFS has in San Jose for MAE-West; I don't recall too many failures or complaints about the quality of that facility. Ask BBN where their SJ POP is located. Since I don't think this list has turned into 'network-engineering' I'll stay away from the P*B NAP vs. MAE-West point. ;-) -jh- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -