|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Internic address allocation policy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Michael, Thank you for your note. It explains a lot to me and likely others. It also resembles the way SRI-NIC.ARPA used to do business. Perhaps it confuses me to see unknowns jumping into place calling SCRUZ-NET an unknown entity when it's run by people whom so many people *DO* know. Just ask Jim Haynes <[email protected]>. These people aren't randoms. Well, sorry, Jim, I don't mean to be volunteering you, but the point is how can honesty be questioned? It seems to superfluous to me to say that they have little honesty. In the name of reducing routing tables Internic Inc. (what a name) has instead been increasing them! If it were John Q. Doe <[email protected]>, ok so ask for a plan and judge their honesty; John needs good service too. But, when it's Matthew, I mean sheesh! We're not talking about the admin of interthisiscoolnet.com.net.com.net here. Some of SCRUZ-NET's customers have been major international news before (remember NAZIs and Germany and Compuserve and censorship?) It's not like they don't exist. As little as I like the NAZIs, I like the ability to keep track of their pulse so I know when to take cover and shoot. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQEVAwUBMpZE1pxWhFYc6x9VAQGNlggAplrrmtLHBsoNQw6/ft34E83rYtGumwqz aK2rYPlw62Jm9VXBlLqvEPn/ea1zVxuNNuYs69MpBtGJiF/P2XoG9i0Fb51rZRqH VXojuyd9BlKp1cR9mbJb28F6c5qmJantSFH1Cr6a/d2eMM/g5Ig+dLwuT0x4xpMF 8LSTie9puBrblISYlXT3dIGFsO/ZXDFY/dj96mn1eYO5JzBSjbimmFM4crPfTr+p UISoIZySjeGAOOz1/q6Z9/KSllSUFkJ1t86itXem5T0wCgSYUYAaZc9mJWDmbriR Ah4VZgfOvFWA9/90kHShkABOOtKz4/2z0AeSgDPLpdp+BbEnw7fhQQ== =yPIG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|