North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Wake Up! (was: spamspamspam)
> So, as a "responsible" ISP, you advocate denial of service attacks? > You are either incredibly naive or intensely stupid to advocate > that position. Is that how you want people to deal with you when .. ... .. .. > have wiped the abuser out of your system. But in the event someone > decides to mail the source to Linux 1000 times to your server, > copying abuse, root, postmaster, and support, they kill off your > entire site, denying thousands of innocent users Internet access. > The number of hours I have wasted over the past four years chasing > down hackers and mail bombers has been a real pain. I have ZERO > tolerance for this behavior. If your systems are so badly configured that a mail bomb attack denies your users access, then you don't qualify as a "responsible ISP" yourself. In fact, you qualify under both "naive" and "intensely stupid". I don't agree with mailbombing, but it sounds like you are ripping your clients off, since you obviously don't know to configure a system. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|