|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: AGIS/DIGEX
> On Tue, 29 Oct 1996, Robert Bowman wrote: > > > This is all very interesting information. It seems at-home recently did > > the same thing with us, as they stopped all transit and were not on CIX, > > basically forcing us to peer with them. Is this the route to get peering > > with the big players that will now evolve? Forced peering due to > > unreachability? > > Ya, we have the same problem, we will be at 7 NAPs by the end of the > month, and DIGEX does not meet our peering requirements. If I don't peer > with DIGEX then our customers yell at us when it is a DIGEX problem. > > What we could do is all cut peering say the first of the year and then > DIGEX would need to buy transit or connect to more NAPs. > > Nathan Stratton CEO, NetRail, Inc. Tracking the future today! I'm quite sure that DIGEX doesn't care a hoot whether they meet netrail's peering requirements. Even more so for ANS, MCI, Sprint, BBN, UUNET, PSI, Netcom, and some others I can think of. In fact, it doesn't appear that you're peering with them now, and until a few weeks ago you were only at MAE-East, while they were also at MAE-West and Pennsauken. Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|