North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave?

  • From: William Allen Simpson
  • Date: Tue Oct 29 11:45:17 1996

> From: Avi Freedman <[email protected]>
> Of course, I argues vehemently against the $10k/year CIX "tax", and this
> would be a "tax" of sorts.
>
> Perhaps there's a better forum than the nanog list for discussion of this -
> perhaps a BOF at the next NANOG meeting would be better.
>
Sorry, Avi, but I disagree.  This is about group operations, and this
_is_ the operations group!  At least the discussion need to start and
end here, so that everyone knowns what is going on.  Although, technical
details discussion could be a new separate list.

Anyway, I'd be very happy if Daniel could help us figure out a way to be
self-sustaining.  If the CIX wanted to offer a RIPE-style of services,
I'd be interested in participating!

I think that the CIX bylaws and member agreement would need a few
changes, but other than that, it seems positioned to take the role.

[email protected]
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
[email protected]
    Key fingerprint =  2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3  59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -