North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: RE: You are right [was Re: Ungodly packet loss rates]
> > ISPs. They do this for routers, bridges, FR services so they can > > probably find a respectable consulting/measurement group to collect > Yes, they do. It would be better (sometimes) if they did not -:) > > When I read their comparations I sometimes think to drom all my hardware > (BAD in terms of this magasines) and bue new one (Bay Networks as BB routers, > FORE ATM as ATM > , etc...). Through it's strange idea (for example) to compare > hight-end Bay router with CS7200 (middle-range router), or to > compare middle-range Lt1010 with Cascade back-bone ATM switchs. > And I am afraid thy would use the same technik for ISP comparation. Well, besides being interesting ISP comparison *may* not be as objective and informative as we'd like to. In addition, what technique do you propose for such comparison? Just asking customers aren't enough, IMHO. And you can't count *every* ISP, even in the US... My 2c, Edgar -- Edgar V.S. Der-Danieliantz Armenia Network Information Center [email protected] Azatootianne 1, Yerevan, Armenia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|