North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Ungodly packet loss rates
At 04:49 PM 21-10-96 -0700, Michael Dillon wrote: >On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Jon Zeeff wrote: > >> In other words, the big players don't like the "open" naps and >> are deliberately not installing sufficient bandwidth to them? > >No, the open NAP's are bad engineering and the big players are fixing the >topology by routing around them. > If you want a private interconnect to avoid having to deal with 100 peering requests per week from every Tom, Dick and Harriet's web page services, OK. But there isn't any gee-whiz technology that you can do at a private interconnect that you can't do at a NAP/MAE. Open NAPs aren't bad engineering. --Kent speaking as a consultant to PacBell NAP services - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|