North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II
> From: [email protected] (Stephen Wolff) > Subject: Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II > *Whenever* there is public funding of *any* activity, an AUP is attached to > oulaw the misuse of taxpayer money. Internet II is not exempt. I see in today's SF Chronicle that Cisco is one of the promoters of the Internet-II project along with Stanford, other universities and companies. Perhaps you could start by convincing Cisco mgmt and save cisco shareholders' money. > Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 12:29:02 -0400 (EDT) > From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <[email protected]> > Would it be impolite to point out that if a $100M R&D effort would > create the technology for a 2-3 order of magnitude speed-up, that the > private sector would be falling all over themselves right this second > to make it happen? Unrelated but see above the support of Cisco, Sprint etc. The same article quoted someone at EFF that there is no need for a new Internet as the current one can be made faster by using cable modems. Hmmm.. Sanjay. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|