|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Internet II is coming...
Recently seen on NANOG:
>> Internet II, if it happens, would be Higher-Ed's intranet.
> Sounds great. It all sounded great until it got to the part about
> "federal funding". I, for one, have a problem with my tax dollars
> going towards some professor being able to gawk at another
> professor in a videoconference.
One could easily name it "NSFNET V2", and it sounds as if they have
declared lack of confidence in ISPs to solve their problems. If I
were one of them, I might reason, "Why should I pay my lack-of-supprt,
peering-point-packet-saturated, overcommitted, BGP-flapping, poor-
cooperation, no-bandwidth-reservation ISP, when I can spend my money
on this new group focussed on this higher level of service? I don't
care if it costs more; it's not like I'm paying for the extra level
of service directly. I want to move my research traffic onto this
network before Bob's big Internet death happens."
If anything, it shows that there's a need for a higher level of
service than what's being provided to everyone jumping onto the
Internet bandwagon. Who pays for it is arbitrary - whether it's
the government or a Fortune 100 company, someone who sees value in
it will pay for it.
There's no question that service is good enough for the masses -
watch them flee online service providers - but now there's a niche
market for the quality of service once provided through NSFNET.
At a recent Usenix, I attended a tutorial on Win95/NT programming
(from a Unix perspective) where the lecturer commented a couple
times, "One can complain all they want about how Windows is inferior
to Unix, but there are those who see it as an opportunity to write
software for Windows that provides the functinality they see lacking
and make lots of money in the process."
(It's not a direct quote, just my interpretation.)
Likewise, people can complain that yet someone else is going to
have a federally funded network, or as a hypothetical network
service provider or telecommunications company I could fill the
need by making a more reliable and feature-rich backbone to connect
to and then take the money of the people who were going to build it
anyway. I think some of the newer and/or larger ISPs are seeing
this need, "Intranet" (a virtual private Internet begging the
phrase "X.25 - the next generation"), and you might see one of them
get the contract to serve what these universities want.
BTW: I noticed after typing that this thread belongs on com-priv, yes?
--
Eric Ziegast
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|