North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

major?

  • From: bmanning
  • Date: Thu Sep 05 17:54:56 1996
  • Posted-date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 14:49:53 -0700 (PDT)

> > No of course it is not.  But bill is your response meant to imply that at
> > a major exchange, there is simply going to be too much traffic to add the
> > web stuff?  Since the server is BEHIND the customer router the web
> > traffic would hit the switch as part of the application layer traffic
> > brought there by the customer.  therefor should it really make any
> > difference to have the web traffic avoid the extra hops of
> > traversing the local loop?
> > 

	Thats a viable assumption.
	There is also the premise that for certain
	types/styles of exchange, direct hosting of
	servers may be a valid design consideration.

	Vertical Niche exchanges are becoming more popular.
	"Traditional" exchanges simply made a number of 
	assumptions wrt participants which are not true.

	Newer exchanges are differentiation themselves
	in a number of ways, including more documentation
	on appropriate use.

	PAIX appears to be targeting the same type of 
	market segment that other, progressive exchanges
	are trying to meet, e.g. colo with exchange.

	Part of the premise of placing all your eggs in
	one basket and then watching the heck out of it.

-- 
--bill
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -