|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Customer AS
> Curtis Villamizar <[email protected]> writes: > > In message <[email protected]>, Paul Ferguson writes: > > > In fact, the <draft-hubbard-registry-guidelines-05.txt> draft indicates > > that this is one of the few acceptable instances when allocation can be > > done by one of the various registries and not by (one of) the upstream > > service provider(s). ... > > draft-hubbard-registry-guidelines-05.txt is wrong on this one. Just for the record: I is one of the few acceptable instances and certainly does not represent common practise, to the contrary! All regional IRs recommend using address space from one of the providers. > If the route comes from one of the providers CIDR blocks, the other > more specific route can be ignored farther away in the topology. If > it is a provider independent address it can't be dropped without > losing connectivity to it. Correct. Daniel - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|