North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: CIX or CRL problems?

  • From: Scott Mace
  • Date: Tue Jul 23 15:03:33 1996

crash % traceroute freefall.cdrom.com
traceroute to freefall.FreeBSD.org (204.216.27.4), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  core4-e1.hou.neo.net (206.109.4.126)  0.885 ms  0.705 ms  0.666 ms
 2  core3-fe2.hou.neo.net (206.109.7.126)  1.323 ms  1.271 ms  1.281 ms
 3  core1-fe1-1.hou.neo.net (206.109.7.34)  2.134 ms  2.127 ms  2.181 ms
 4  border8-hssi1-0.Houston.mci.net (204.70.195.5)  4.782 ms  4.034 ms  3.551 ms
 5  core2-fddi-1.Houston.mci.net (204.70.191.65)  127.672 ms  3.284 ms  204.229 ms
 6  core1-aip-4.Houston.mci.net (204.70.1.189)  7.296 ms  4.127 ms  3.511 ms
 7  core1-hssi-4.Dallas.mci.net (204.70.1.121)  10.185 ms  10.463 ms  13.329 ms
 8  core3.SanFrancisco.mci.net (204.70.4.17)  49.368 ms  52.705 ms  51.384 ms
 9  mae-west-nap.SanFrancisco.mci.net (204.70.1.14)  54.612 ms  53.221 ms  55.874 ms
10  T3-CRL-SFO-01-H1/0.US.CRL.NET (198.32.136.10)  78.138 ms  72.259 ms  68.579 ms
11  T3-CRL-SFO-01-H3/0.US.CRL.NET (149.20.64.19)  80.893 ms  82.276 ms  91.322 ms
12  E0-CRL-SFO-02-E0/0.US.CRL.NET (165.113.55.2)  119.768 ms  128.540 ms  138.504 ms
13  T1-CDROM-00-EX.US.CRL.NET (165.113.118.2)  123.243 ms  105.063 ms  85.623 ms
14  freefall.FreeBSD.ORG (204.216.27.4)  107.998 ms  101.339 ms  113.213 ms

freefall % traceroute mirror.neosoft.com
traceroute mirror.neosoft.com
traceroute to mirror.neosoft.com (206.109.1.17), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  gatekeeper.cdrom.com (204.216.27.1)  2.229 ms  2.025 ms  2.817 ms
 2  R-CRL-SFO-01-EX.US.CRL.NET (165.113.118.1)  8.155 ms  8.856 ms  25.995 ms
 3   (165.113.55.1)  154.320 ms  52.897 ms  301.080 ms
 4  border3-hssi1-0.SanFrancisco.mci.net (149.20.64.9)  107.457 ms  93.237 ms  64.428 ms
 5  core1-fddi-0.SanFrancisco.mci.net (204.70.2.161)  88.451 ms  89.330 ms *
 6  core3.Dallas.mci.net (204.70.4.13)  136.363 ms  106.641 ms  132.381 ms
 7  core1-hssi-3.Houston.mci.net (204.70.1.122)  151.463 ms  201.586 ms *
 8  core2-aip-4.Houston.mci.net (204.70.1.190)  104.699 ms  144.291 ms  169.130 ms
 9  border8-fddi-0.Houston.mci.net (204.70.191.67)  164.093 ms  169.815 ms  86.252 ms
10  neosoft.Houston.mci.net (204.70.195.6)  97.959 ms  87.195 ms  117.670 ms
11  mirror.neosoft.com (206.109.1.17)  100.091 ms  100.151 ms  88.256 ms

Seems that CRL and MCI are prefering each others routes at different NAPs?

	Scott
-- 
[email protected] - KC5NUA - Scott Mace - Network Engineer - Neosoft Inc.
Any opinions expressed are mine.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -