|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Sprint NAP
> To: Peter Lothberg <[email protected]> > Cc: "nanog" <[email protected]> > Subject: Sprint NAP > From: Daniel Karrenberg <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 10:04:26 +0200 > > > Peter Lothberg <[email protected]> writes: > > > > SPRINT NETWORK ACCESS POINT (NAP) > > TERMS AND CONDITIONS > > .... > > > > 6. IP Address Assignment > > > > The customer shall receive his IP address assignment(s) from Sprint. Any > > address(es) provided by Sprint shall remain the property of Sprint ... > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Address ownership .... what a concept. > Although this is doing the right thing, the wording is dubious. Actually, I believe that the addresses in question are _host_ addresses, (for devices directly attached to the Sprint NAP). I don't quite know what someone would do with a Sprint NAP host address if they "kept" it. You are correct that the language seems rather emphatic to networking types, but it probably works well for the lawyers. -tjs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|