|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: tilting at windmills discussion 2
Do you also happen to have a breakdown of what ports this raffic was going to/from? The reason I ask iss that this seems to lead to a conclusion that a lot of the data was for "interactive" services such as telnet and the like as opposed to batch transfer type of connections such as ftp, and sendmail. At 03:29 AM 6/19/96 -0400, Dorian Kim wrote: >On Tue, 18 Jun 1996, Jerry Scharf wrote: > >> the overhead for various framing methods. Hopefully taking >> empirical data from the internet and giving people code will reduce >> the discussions of what the "cell tax" for real traffic is. Don't >> like my traffic, collect your own. Fighting over conclusions will >> be left to others. > >In a similar vein, something to think about: > >IP packet size distribution (970780293 total packets): > 1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384 416 448 480 > .000 .497 .094 .013 .009 .006 .007 .010 .010 .014 .004 .005 .002 .002 .002 > ^^^^ > 512 544 576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608 > .004 .002 .189 .000 .069 .053 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 > >Collected at a private interconnect between CICNet, OARnet and OSU. over a >period of a week or so. > >-dorian > > > Justin Newton Internet Architect Erol's Internet Services - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|