North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: tilting at windmills discussion 2
On Tue, 18 Jun 1996, Jerry Scharf wrote: > the overhead for various framing methods. Hopefully taking > empirical data from the internet and giving people code will reduce > the discussions of what the "cell tax" for real traffic is. Don't > like my traffic, collect your own. Fighting over conclusions will > be left to others. In a similar vein, something to think about: IP packet size distribution (970780293 total packets): 1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384 416 448 480 .000 .497 .094 .013 .009 .006 .007 .010 .010 .014 .004 .005 .002 .002 .002 ^^^^ 512 544 576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608 .004 .002 .189 .000 .069 .053 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Collected at a private interconnect between CICNet, OARnet and OSU. over a period of a week or so. -dorian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|