North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service
Original message <[email protected]> From: [email protected] (Bill Manning) Date: May 7, 14:53 Subject: Re: FWD: Pacific Bell's LA NAP in service > > > > > On Tue, 7 May 1996, Kent W. England wrote: > > > > > Pac Bell has announced their LA NAP is operational. Contact and details below. > > > > Is there not already a MAE-LA? Why would thay have an LA NAP if even > > MAE-LA hasn't taken off as of yet? > > > > Just a question. > > > > Christian Nielsen > > Yes, there is. I would expect that the NAP service is offering > is an extention of the existing BayArea service. This approach > reduces the cost of entry of entry for people you are in the So.Cal. > area to a local loop charge. > It appears that thye believe that a "distributed" service is > more effective than two seperate exchanges. > > > -- > --bill >-- End of excerpt from Bill Manning As far as I know, PacBell wouldn't be permitted to extend PVCs between the LA NAP and the SF NAP -matthew kaufman [email protected] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|