|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: I-D (Re: Out of date contact information )
In message <[email protected]>, Paul A Vixie writes: > > > I've added ROUTING to do what TROUBLE is often used to do. > > > > I question whether this is a good idea -- some providers have a > > "routing" mailing list that isn't really intended for public > > dissemination and use. For instance, [email protected] and > > [email protected] both bypass their respective NOCs and go straight to > > engineering types -- perhaps we need to pick a new name for those > > sorts of lists, but I really don't see what having a "routing" > > buys us over "noc". > > This is the kind of collision that makes this "standard" expensive to > implement. Folks elsewhere use ROUTING as a way to reach the folks > who want to hear about externally visible routing problems; NETCOM > for example advertises this address in its RADB elements. I think > that folks like UUNET and ESNET will have to pick new addresses if > they don't want their engineers getting spammed. Sorry about that. ANS uses routing the same way uunet and esnet do. I think MCI does the same. Netcom is in the minority. Curtis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|