|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Out of date contact information
You know that all this stuff was standardized long ago at an IETF
working group? The group was called Network Joint Management.
We all agreed that there should be a trouble mailing list for each NOC
and I believe we agreed on AS mailing lists as well. It is a shame,
but I don't believe that that group ever put out an RFC specifying
this. There was also a group that worked on inter-NOC communications
and sharing trouble tickets, etc.
---Cathy
From: Alan Hannan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Out of date contact information
Jonathan Heileger and myself are doing some work on issues similar
and inclusive to this, having to do w/ inter-NOC communication, and
we are planning a presentation at the next NANOG.
FYI...
-alan
......... Dorian Kim is rumored to have said:
]
] This would be something we could probably standardize. I wonder how many folks
] have mail aliases like [email protected], [email protected], etc to bounce messages
] right ways. At the ver least, it'll make /etc/alias file shorter for good
] number of people. :)
]
] -dorian ([email protected])
]
] On Thu, 2 May 1996, Nevin Williams wrote:
]
] > We here like [email protected] It's an all-purpose group, like
] > support, but has a sense of urgency to it.
] >
] > Nevin
] >
] >
] > -Nevin Williams
] > ANS Network Operations
] >
] >
] >
] > Andrew Partan writes:
] > >
] > > > I have found that, with only one unnamed exception, if you write
] > > > to [email protected]
] > >
] > > How about folks use:
] > > [email protected]
] > > to reach people?
] > >
] > > [Is there any consensus on various support aliases that an ISP 'should'
] > > have? noc, help, hostmaster, support, postmaster, routing, info, sales,
] > > trouble, others?]
] > > [email protected] (Andrew Partan)
] > >
] >
] >
] >
] >
]
]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|