North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: packet loss (was re: mae-west congestion)
Peter Kaminski wrote: > > Matthew Kaufman writes about the Ames FDDI ring saturation: > > >What I don't understand is why that has _stayed_ saturated... it seems > >to me that some of the big players would have rerouted their traffic > >by now to avoid subjecting it to this, which would also have the side > >effect of causing the problem to, at least for the short term, go > >away. > > ...or why MFS hasn't installed a Gigaswitch there, or whatever. We're > seeing 20% - 30% packet loss through AGIS to MCI and Sprintlink during > the day, and it's not fun. Speaking of fddi rings, saturation, and packet loss.. has anyone taken a look at the peering between mcinet and cicnet at the chicago nap? i get about the same (20-30%) packet loss during the day. and no, it's not fun at all. -- [email protected]
|