North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: cisco OC3 interfaces
>We've certainly been known to do some pretty silly things before, and >some would say that a lot of things we're doing now are pretty silly :-) My favorite silly thing is having both shoes drop within a week. Dave (and Dave), I know I'm not a party to this little tension, but I just can't help myself. I've gotta post. >Regardless, an non-disclosure agreement is a non-disclosure agreement. IMHO, you did much more damage with your original post, dated the 19th (?) which said: >If anyone has been discussing other OC3 interfaces with you, they >are potentially in violation of a non-disclosure agreement, and I >would suggest that such conversations shouldn't be happening. To me, this SCREAMS: "There will be an OC3 interface for the 4700 NLT Christmas, maybe sooner." Oh, I get it. First, exploit someone else's mistake, then make a follow-up post to a newsgroup (or auto-CC?) to iron the point home just in case nobody caught the faux pas the first time around. Yeah, that's marketing, right? My mistake. Don't get me wrong, Dave, I have no disrespect for you (you've helped me before), and obviously I buy Cisco...a LOT. But sometimes... I just wanted you to know: we're listening. That way, you won't have to post a note that says, "I mean, if we WERE to have an OC3 interface for a non-7xxx, nobody's allowed to speculate what that might be for." Carl Cogito Ergo Amicrosoft And, BTW, dear reader, don't CC me and the bloody list / group too!