North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations

  • From: Nick Hilliard
  • Date: Fri Feb 02 07:56:47 1996

> 	Perhaps there is better wisdom out there on correct metrics
> 	for these values.  From my limited viewpoint, the only way
> 	to recover the space is a voluntary return, based on the
> 	original allocation policies.

There must be some mechanism implemented whereby address space will return
to the IANA after a specified period of time unless otherwise requested by
the prefix holder.  Otherwise what will happen is that this 60% (or some
other large percentage when the figures finally settle) of the 192/8 address
space will effectively be lost from the internet with no real means of
retrieving it.  A system like this without any garbage collection mechanism
is eventually going to fill up with defunct allocations and the cruft of
years past -- something which is not an option when dealing with limited
address space.

> 	as a technological means to protect a networks internal 
> 	stability, is presumptious and rude at best and legally 
> 	indefensable at worst.

How are the InterNIC coping with the new domain name charging scheme?  If
this were successful, a similar scheme might be considered for address
prefixes.  The legal consequences are similar if not quite the same, and
one is really no more rude or presumptious than the other.