North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Not to beat a dead horse
> From: Avi Freedman <[email protected]> > But I still see 4 /24s advertised in 208/8: > > Now, besides the fact that 208.0.4.0 & 208.0.5.0 could be 208.0.4.0/23 > (grin), what IS the appropriate way to deal with an ongoing situation > where un-NIC-allocated IP space is advertised on the Internet? > My solution would be to filter the routes based on AS. Someday, those routes will be announced from a valid provider, and you will need to know the valid AS from which they should be announced to ignore the bogons. > We have no plans to implement incoming route filters on 208/8 - who > knows when the NIC will start allocating out of it. > The RA knows? Maybe this is a valid use of the RADB? Cannot the NIC update the RA with both prefix and AS? [email protected] Key fingerprint = 2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3 59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2
|