North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: CIDR Aggregation Tool
[Please take any other responses just to cidrd. This is copied to big-inet and nanog so people will see the followup request. I just wanted the announcement to go out maximally, but the details and responses are of no interet to nanog as a whole...] > > Our route table has: > > *> 198.111.252.0 192.41.177.145 <--- agis > > *> 198.111.252.0/22 192.41.177.181 <--- mci > > *> 198.111.253.0 192.41.177.145 <--- agis > > *> 198.111.255.0 192.41.177.145 <--- agis > > This isn't what agis is supposed to be announcing, I'll have to > ask them again to announce 198.111.252/22. There's a couple less > routes already :-). > > Once that is fixed, further aggregation of 198.111.252.0 (say into > 198.111/16, as a non real example) would change our routing (in > ways we don't want it changed), even with your "next hop the same" > criteria because of the additional meaning that specifics have in > terms of priority. Well, we only see 198.111.252, 253, and 255 from AGIS, so there's no danger of AGIS over-aggregating even if they combined 252 & 253... > I agree that your tool is usefull in identifying _potential_ savings. That's all it's for. Avi
|