North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Professionalism, etc...
Tim: Can we please actually practice some professionalism by getting back to technical topics? This list is for Network Operators. Thank you, Steve Richardson/Merit == >From [email protected] Thu Nov 2 11:14:40 1995 >Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [184.108.40.206]) by home.merit.edu (8.6.12/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id LAA08939; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 11:14:35 -0500 >Received: from dune.silkroad.com ([email protected] [220.127.116.11]) by merit.edu (8.6.12/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id KAA05890 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:29:01 -0500 >Received: (from [email protected]) by dune.silkroad.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id KAA10570; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:26:28 -0500 >From: Tim Bass <[email protected]> >Message-Id: <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Professionalism, etc... >To: [email protected] (Jeff Young) >Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:26:28 -0500 (EST) >Cc: [email protected] >In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Jeff Young" at Nov 2, 95 08:09:35 am >X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP2] >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Length: 1376 >Status: R > > >This is getting personal and way off topic, so I'll take the >'middle road' with Jeff before we drag this down more, > give a short response, and end it. > >( with my financee in Germany for over a month, and absolutely > no sleep last night, I cannot find the 'high road' this AM, > sorry ... ) > >Whomever is superhuman, always speaks and rights exactly what >they intend, always void of emotion and in complete understanding >of all past and present (not to mention future) events and >actions please continue this discussion without me :-) > >I am human and therefore not worthy to discuss professionalism >nor any human condition. Thanks Jeff, for pointing that out. >I need to be constantly reminded of my imperfections. I >realize them myself, but appreciate your reminder and tact. > >.... we should all follow Jeff's example and when any human >forwards or advocates an idea, no matter what the position, >lets look for a human fault and or some 'not so perfect' >assembly of symbols of expression (words) with 'not so perfect' >foundation (human emotions) and use them to counter argue. > >It certainly works very well to defocus the discussion from >one of ideas and aspirations and to create an interesting >side show. Excellent counterpoint Jeff. It is impossible >for me, unworthly, soiled, and defeated to continue in the >' has professionalism been redefined ?' thread. > > >Tim > >