North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd)
> . are all three (four?) NAPs really being used Yes. for some value of "used". > . Is there any evidence that the NAPs are really backing each other > up? Not sure this is possible. Perhaps the better question is, are providers using the NAPs to back each other up. > . do we have some regular examples from *any* site A initiating a > connection from A to B, A to C, and A to D, where the three are > verifiably (via traceroute, I guess) would traverse different NAPs > (and hopefully only one each)? Yes. > . Are there routing stability reports accessible online from the RA > (or whoever else feels responsible for this) that graph fluctuations > at the NAPs, including correlation among them? What are the quality > metrics for routing stability? Being defined. > . Do all the NAPs provide online statistics? No. > . Are the NAP and RA regular reports to NSF publicly (hopefully via > the Web) available? http://info.ra.net/papers have the annual report/plan papers > . Is there any way NANOG can be used to exchange status information > accessible via the network. Is someone already working on that? > Would not NANOG be *the* forum to cooperate on that? Sounds like a really good idea to me. --bill
|