Beginning September 01 1995
Messages: 251
Page 1 of 1
First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) provides a forum for the exchange of technical information, and promotes discussion of implementation issues that require community cooperation.

There are several methods for joining the nanog list.

This archive is updated hourly. The searchable index is updated nightly.

Account of Maryland Center for Telecommunications Research

• 09/12/95 Speakers: 6th Maryland Workshop on Very
  

Alan Hannan

• 09/25/95 204.82.160.0/22 invisible (fwd)
  
• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Andrew Partan

• 09/29/95 Re: MAE-LA?
  
• 09/27/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 206.40.160.0/20
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  

Arnold Nipper

• 09/11/95 194.45.0.0/16 still unresolved
  

Avi Freedman

• 09/29/95 Re: MAE-LA?:
  
• 09/26/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?:$
  

Barney Wolff

• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  

Bill Manning

• 09/29/95 MAE-LA?
  
• 09/20/95 Re: updated web pointer
  

bmanning

• 09/26/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?
  
• 09/26/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  

Brian Renaud

• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/07/95 PGP authentication for the RADB
  

CERT Advisory

• 09/26/95 CERT Summary CS-95:02
  
• 09/19/95 CERT Advisory CA-95:11 - Sun Sendmail -o
  

CERT Bulletin

• 09/28/95 CERT Vendor-Initiated Bulletin VB-95:07
  

Curtis Villamizar

• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/27/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  

D. Brian Kimmel

• 09/30/95 Re: Comments on Routing and Allocation P
  

Daniel Karrenberg

• 09/22/95 Sprint violations (setting space aside f
  

Dave Crocker

• 09/23/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  

Dave Israel

• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  

Dave O'Leary

• 09/23/95 NIC switchover dates
  

Dave Siegel

• 09/26/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/25/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/22/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/22/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/12/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

David Conrad

• 09/26/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  

David R Conrad

• 09/23/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  
• 09/22/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/22/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  

Dennis Ferguson

• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• 09/22/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  

Dorian Kim

• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible (fwd)
  

Dorian Rysling Kim

• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Ed Kern

• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  

Ehud Gavron

• 09/24/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  

Eliot Lear

• 09/21/95 Re: Sprint violations
  
• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Elliot Alby

• 09/27/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/27/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/27/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  

Eric Kozowski

• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  

Eric.M.Aupperle

• 09/22/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  

Forrest W. Christian

• 09/30/95 Re: Comments on Routing and Allocation P
  
• 09/30/95 Re: Comments on Routing and Allocation P
  
• 09/30/95 Comments on Routing and Allocation Polic
  

Geert Jan de Groot

• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  

Geoff Huston

• 09/26/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/26/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  

George Herbert

• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/23/95 Request for Comments on a topological ad
  

Gordon Cook

• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/22/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  
• 09/22/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  
• 09/22/95 Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re: 206
  

Guy Middleton

• 09/25/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  

Guy T Almes

• 09/22/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  

Hank Nussbacher

• 09/26/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  

Hans-Werner Braun

• 09/23/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/23/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  
• 09/23/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  
• 09/22/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  
• 09/22/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Jake Khuon

• 09/28/95 Operational declaration of route servers
  

James Cassell

• 09/07/95 Re: Pittsburgh directions
  

Jamshid Mahdavi

• 09/27/95 Treno Server is available...
  

Jeremy Porter

• 09/26/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?
  
• 09/25/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  

Jim Dixon

• 09/29/95 Re: MAE-LA?
  

John Bradley

• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  

John Riordan

• 09/23/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  

Jon Zeeff

• 09/11/95 Re: Flapping prefixes and dialup network
  

Kai

• 09/27/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible (fwd)
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible (fwd)
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/24/95 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/22/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/22/95 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  

kbc

• 09/26/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?:$
  

Kent W. England

• 09/14/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Kim Hubbard

• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible (fwd)
  
• 09/25/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  

labovit

• 09/06/95 NEW Tool Announcement
  

Larry J. Plato

• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  
• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Marcos Della

• 09/26/95 Peering in the LA region?!?
  

Mark Davisson

• 09/27/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/27/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  

Mark Kent

• 09/29/95 number of unaggregated class C's in swam
  
• 09/21/95 Sprint violations
  
• 09/21/95 Sprint violations
  
• 09/21/95 filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/21/95 filtering long prefixes
  

Martyne Hallgren

• 09/13/95 New Home for GateD
  

Mathew Lodge

• 09/22/95 RE: Sprint violations
  

Matt Mathis

• 09/13/95 Lost coat
  
• 09/12/95 Re: tape
  
• 09/10/95 MBone broadcast of Monday's and Tuesday'
  

MBYRON10

• 09/08/95 Fwd: You have been removed from the list
  

Michael Dillon

• 09/30/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/30/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/30/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/30/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/22/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  
• 09/11/95 Re: Flapping prefixes and dialup network
  

Michael f. Nittmann

• 09/26/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?:$
  
• 09/12/95 cusemee?
  
• 09/12/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  
• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  
• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Michael H. Behringer

• 09/21/95 FYI: EuropaNET migration
  

Michael StJohns

• 09/23/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  
• 09/22/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  

Mike Nasto

• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Nathan Stratton

• 09/19/95 Re: updated web pointer
  
• 09/12/95 tape
  

Neal Castagnoli

• 09/07/95 What do you use interdomain routing for?
  

Nick Williams

• 09/25/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/23/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/22/95 Re: Sprint violations (setting space asi
  
• 09/21/95 Re: Sprint violations (setting space asi
  
• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/21/95 Re: Sprint violations (setting space asi
  

Nigel Allen

• 09/30/95 geeting NANOG listed in Encyclopedia of
  

Noel Chiappa

• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/26/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/26/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/25/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/25/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/25/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/24/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/24/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/22/95 RE: Sprint violations
  
• 09/22/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/22/95 Re: Sprint violations
  

nordlund

• 09/08/95 Re: What do you use interdomain routing
  

Owen DeLong

• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Paul Ferguson

• 09/22/95 Re: Sprint violations
  
• 09/22/95 Re: Authority over IANA & IP #s was Re:
  

Per Gregers Bilse

• 09/21/95 Re: Sprint violations
  

Peter Berger

• 09/17/95 The InterNIC's talk at NANOG
  

Peter Kline

• 09/28/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?
  

Politics

• 09/23/95 Proposed State & Federal Regulations for
  

postel

• 09/29/95 HK IT Expo Opens On Internet Traffic Jam
  

Prieur J. Leary, III

• 09/29/95 Class "C" Filtering
  
• 09/28/95 Join Mailist
  

PSI NISC

• 09/11/95 nisc-03292 (ticket update) badly flappin
  

Pushpendra Mohta

• 09/26/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?
  

Randy Bush

• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  

Robert A. Rosenberg

• 09/23/95 RE: Sprint violations
  

Robert Elz

• 09/26/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  

Robert Gibson

• 09/11/95 Re: Other flapping prefixes. Compare and
  

Robert Hood

• 09/26/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?
  

Ross Veach

• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  

santa

• 09/29/95 Forwarded mail..
  

Scott Bradner

• 09/23/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  

Scott Mace

• 09/25/95 206.40.160.0/20
  

Sean Doran

• 09/26/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/26/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/25/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible (fwd)
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/23/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/23/95 multicast and smd's brain-damage
  
• 09/23/95 access-list 112
  
• 09/23/95 206.0.0.0/8 and /19s
  
• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/21/95 Re: Sprint violations (setting space asi
  
• 09/21/95 Re: Sprint violations
  
• 09/21/95 Re: Sprint violations
  
• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/21/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/21/95 filtering long prefixes
  
• 09/11/95 Re: nisc-03292 (ticket update) badly fla
  
• 09/11/95 one more
  
• 09/11/95 Other flapping prefixes. Compare and co
  
• 09/11/95 Flapping prefixes and dialup networks.
  

skh

• 09/21/95 Merit GateD Consortium
  

Stan Barber

• 09/29/95 Notes from last NANOG on line
  
• 09/25/95 Internic Reference documents jump point
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 206.40.160.0/20
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 206.40.160.0/20
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 206.40.160.0/20
  
• 09/23/95 Top-Level Domain discussion at NANOG
  
• 09/23/95 Recent discussion on address ownership f
  
• 09/15/95 Another tool to look at?
  
• 09/14/95 agenda page is up
  
• 09/12/95 Re: tape
  
• 09/11/95 May 1995 note update
  

Steve Feldman

• 09/29/95 Re: MAE-LA?
  
• 09/26/95 Re: Peering in the LA region?!?
  

Steve Goldstein

• 09/29/95 Re: Forwarded mail..
  
• 09/25/95 Almaty lives...Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invis
  

Steven J. Richardson

• 09/12/95 Re: tape
  
• 09/11/95 skey @ Nanog
  

Susan R. Harris

• 09/06/95 Agenda for next week
  

Tim Bass

• 09/30/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  

Tony Li

• 09/25/95 Re: 206.82.160.0/22
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/24/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  

Vadim Antonov

• 09/25/95 Re: Request for Comments on a topologica
  
• 09/25/95 Re: 204.82.160.0/22 invisible
  

Walter O. Haas

• 09/30/95 Re: Comments on Routing and Allocation P
  
• 09/30/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  

Willi Huber

• 09/26/95 Re: filtering long prefixes
  

William Allen Simpson

• 09/30/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/29/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  
• 09/28/95 number of unaggregated class C's in swam
  

Yakov Rekhter

• 09/30/95 Re: number of unaggregated class C's in
  

First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

Previous month