North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?
> > Filtering only serves to violate the premise of BGP4 and routing in general - > that the metrics and route weights will guide a packet to the most expeditious > path. When you remove some of those choices, you second-guess the physical > realities of the time. > Filtering does not violate any premise in BGP4. BGP4 was designed to allow the assignment of administrative weights. That is to say, POLICY. And I happen to believe not accepting a route for 204.68.252/24 from someone who is not authorized to route the associated ASes is a good policy. If someone announced a route to NET99 that was not authorized then ANS would ignore that route, and you would still have connectivity through us. Only the customers of the ISP who misconfigured his equipment, and anyone uniformed enough to accept routes from him, would lose out. Yes, as Vadim points out, there is an administrative cost to filing NACRs. Yes, you need bigger, faster routers with a LOT more memory. Yes, I see outages every day because someone did not file a NACR, filed it incorrectly, or it was not processed on time. But the resulting connectivity is, IMHO, more robust than, to borrow a metaphor, having promiscuous sessions with all your peers and praying you don't get the 'black hole', Larry Plato ANS Network Operations