North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?

  • From: Michael F. Nittmann
  • Date: Wed Apr 19 16:51:51 1995

my opinion: the nacr style is good, because it requires really getting 
the thing right and thought out.

Anyways, such a db should be used infrequently. aggregation should make 
frequent entries unnecessary. (...)

ripe's telnet is good too, but a real telnet online type access would 
invite sloppyness, and/or repalce route flap by nultiple daily policy 


Wed, 19 Apr 1995, Vadim Antonov wrote:

> [email protected] (John G. Scudder) wrote:
> >What AS690 does is not just bureaucratic silliness.  It's also enlightened
> >self-interest (as Curtis keeps saying).  If enough people have the sense to
> >want to protect themselves, the Routing Registry will fly.
> I agree with the idea of Routing Registry (although i'm more than sceptical
> about RADB in its present form, replacing distributed computation with
> a cental box not controlled by the service providers).
> However, my point is that it should be easy to use and should be on-line;
> the NACR-style configuration nightmare is not going to fly.
> --vadim

Michael F. Nittmann                                             [email protected]
Network Architect						[email protected] 
B3 Corporation, Marshfield, WI (CIX Member)               (715) 387 1700 xt. 158
US Cyber (SM), Washington DC				  (715) 573 2448
							  (715) 831 7922