North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Internic address allocation policy
> > > >Looks like a double standard to me... The same argument could be placed > >for any subnet not on an 8,16, or 24 bit bound. > > Yes and no. Technical limitations in things like in-addr name service make > moving things with any boundary in the last byte very difficult, but things > with any boundary before it possible (and a boundary on a byte much easier). > But there are ways to do this -now-. Folks are just not willing to do it. (Ever look at how TPC.INT works? How about NSAP in-addrs?) Look, the in-addr argument is just that. -- --bill
|