North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IP provider performance measurement BOF
In message <[email protected]>, "Roger Fajman" writes: > > I think that this is a great idea, however, I want to stress > > that the appropriate forum for the discussion of _results_ > > as opposed to the development of the tools to gather them > > is NOT the IETF, but rather NANOG or IESG. > > > > Any attempt by a WG at IETF to benchmark issues related > > to operations, or to attempt to compare operational aspects > > of ISPs, is something that I will not find particularly friendly. > > > > OTOH, I *would* like to see NANOG and IESG be the place > > to test whatever the WG comes up with and to discuss and > > share results. > > > > Sean. > > Some of us customers would like to see such results too. > They don't have to come from an IETF WG, but it would be > very helpful for them to come from some unbiased source. > Perhaps Scott Bradner has some spare time. :-) > > Roger Fajman Telephone: +1 301 402 4265 > National Institutes of Health BITNET: [email protected] > Bethesda, Maryland, USA Internet: [email protected] IMO the IETF Operations Area has not been unfair or hostile toward providers. I'm not sure what the objections are. Curtis
|