North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: SF NAP status (Sprint)

  • From: Bob Collet
  • Date: Sat Nov 12 07:12:17 1994

> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 21:19:39 -0500 (EST) 
> From: Gordon Cook <[email protected]> 
> Subject: Re: SF NAP status 
> To: Frank Liu <[email protected]> 
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
>         [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
>         pacbell.com, [email protected], [email protected], 
>         [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
>         pacbell.com, 
>         [email protected], [email protected], 
>         [email protected] 
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> 
> Message-Id: <[email protected]> 
> Mime-Version: 1.0 
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII 
> 
> Two things seem strange.  Why is Sprint only thinking about connecting 
> to the california NAP? I thought it was mandatory for sprint to do so?? 
> Why is sprint late? 
> 

Please be advised, Sprint will connect to all 3 priority NAPs.  The order 
should be received very soon.

Thanks

Bob Collet
Director, Engineering and Operations
Network Systems and Internet Services
Sprint





> 2nd question:  for those of us outside of california...what the heck is 
> the PUC thing all about? 
> 
> 
> 
> ******************************************************************** 
> Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher		Subscr.:  Individ       $85 
> The COOK Report on Internet -> NREN		Non Prof., Gov't & 
> 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618		Small Corp      $175 
> (609) 882-2572					Corp. Site 
> Lic  $500 Internet: [email protected]          Monthly policy & 
> tech news 
> ******************************************************************** 
> 
> 
> 


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -