North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: SF NAP status (Sprint)
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 21:19:39 -0500 (EST) > From: Gordon Cook <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: SF NAP status > To: Frank Liu <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > pacbell.com, [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > pacbell.com, > [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Message-Id: <[email protected]> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > Two things seem strange. Why is Sprint only thinking about connecting > to the california NAP? I thought it was mandatory for sprint to do so?? > Why is sprint late? > Please be advised, Sprint will connect to all 3 priority NAPs. The order should be received very soon. Thanks Bob Collet Director, Engineering and Operations Network Systems and Internet Services Sprint > 2nd question: for those of us outside of california...what the heck is > the PUC thing all about? > > > > ******************************************************************** > Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher Subscr.: Individ $85 > The COOK Report on Internet -> NREN Non Prof., Gov't & > 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 Small Corp $175 > (609) 882-2572 Corp. Site > Lic $500 Internet: [email protected] Monthly policy & > tech news > ******************************************************************** > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|