North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: A sample bilateral agreement in Sprint's NAP handbook

  • From: Ken Latta
  • Date: Tue Nov 01 13:25:13 1994

And of course if you have a bilateral (or multilateral) peering arrangement for
a NAP location, please consider letting us post it on our Web server:
  http://www.ra.net/home.html
Thanks.

Ken Latta, Merit Network, Inc.
NSFNET Project, Internet Engineering Group
1071 Beal, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2103
313.936.2115 voice,  313.747.3745 fax
[email protected], [email protected]

> From:    Paul Love <[email protected]>
> To:      Martin Lee Schoffstall <[email protected]>
> CC:      [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

> 
> In ref. to marty's note below, if others have a bilateral they'd like
> to share I'd be glad to see if I can fit another into the next
> version.  Be sure to strip out any name/other info, etc before
> forwarding.
> 
> 
> paul
> 
> On Tue, 1 Nov 1994, Martin Lee Schoffstall wrote:
> 
> > don't sweat it, i was just being my normal cajoling self
> > 
> > other bilats are what i'd like to see
> > 
> > m
> > 
> > > Marty
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the lack of credit to PSI.  It will be rectified ASAP.
> > > The fault is mine for not checking where the original text came 
> > > from, for which you have humble apologies. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Paul
> > > Consultant to Sprint
> > > for the NSF NAP Project
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 1 Nov 1994, Marty Schoffstall wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > fyi,
> > > > 
> > > > the bilateral agreement found in the sprint nap handbook is 90% materia
lly
> > > > what PSI and SPRINT have worked on together for a bilateral. (it would
> > > > be nice if sprint had given us a bit of citation there).
> > > > 
> > > > This is the second bilateral example that psi has worked on with others
.
> > > > Since bilaterals are EXPLICITLY part of the NAP model, it would be nice
> > > > to see some other agreements posted for reference purposes, or is this
> > > > going to be confidential/proprietary matters?
> > > > 
> > > > marty
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -