North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical wiretapping continues....
> John Scudder then discussed some modeling he and Sue Hares have done > on the projected load at the NAPs. The basic conclusions are that the > FDDI technology (at Sprint) will be saturated sometime next year and > that load-balancing strategies among NSPs across the NAPS is > imperative for the long term viability of the new architecture. John > also expressed concern over the lack of expressed policy for > the collection of statistical data by the NAP operators. All of the > NAP operator are present and stated that they will collect data, but > that there are serious and open questions concerning the privacy of > that data and how to publish it appropriately. John said that > collecting the data was most important. Without the data, there is > no source information from which publication become possible. He said > that MERIT/NSFNET had already tackled these issues. Maybe the > NAP operators can use this previous work as a model to develop their > own policies for publication. > Merit/NSFNet already tackled these issues in an insufficent and unopen manner. MarkFedor/ColeLibby from PSI said there was a "quiet" admission that the old methodology was already "approved" for the SPRINT NAP. Marty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|