can the memory technology save the routing table size scalability problem?

North American Network Operators Group

can the memory technology save the routing table size scalability problem?

From: yangyang. wang
Date: Tue Jan 08 21:26:57 2008

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=0cs7+MBYccStwgIIHBtgOazbEkHQOV81yVI0BJPfNQ4=; b=CcsAh7+UTZ0QReh9bNDo26K8gZCviSu0Bz1ABh6f+ovKHEY8OSN+kXO8ga+iRQSndGZdXiBA4qensmgWoI+QROH1+v/vUsJU1P3HSpWWIlM/8woLSFbuPSHvWgKMc6rFTkWo05/erw+9G36pl2+Cesxj4SMzZ4o1dZ7ZZmUa2Xs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=pMMG44tXRXjOtMiF0wlNDbHkvPrkxG9QwZghN4jAqKCoadv9Up9yU0VdATDpo2oV4pj/mTO7bA0Tzph/Mpsq0e9iQo+/XZY/bdZHv9M9Uc++myZBMeroW0xJPMcAfgb51eGmIDESVzOTUSvdxyhphM3/cDHMsN/Fz0MgzJH7+P4=

As we known, the DFZ RIB size expand rapidly. It may be resolved via router architecture improvement, such as adding memory chips or compressing RIB. or via changing routing and addressing scheme, which one will be the long-term essential approach?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: can the memory technology save the routing table size scalability problem? Christopher Morrow
- Re: can the memory technology save the routing table size scalability problem? Suresh Ramasubramanian

Prev by Date: Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets.
Next by Date: Re: can the memory technology save the routing table size scalability problem?
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Historical