North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Paper on Email Authentication (Authorization really) (was - Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?)
On 06/13/05, "william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> wrote: > > No matter how the authors may "promote" their methods, most > > people don't perceive that there's any great separation between > > anti-spam and anti-forgery techniques. As far as they're > > concerned, all e-mail threats are basically the same. > > This attitude is exactly playing in the hands of DMA which wants to > make it seem like spam is only those UBE with forged origin data. I'm not describing my own attitude above, so you can stop being insulting. What I've described is a common perception held by end-user types. I'm not saying their perceptions are correct, I'm just saying they exist and shouldn't be ignored. This is moving further off-topic, so I'll leave it at that. -- J.D. Falk blong! you are a pickle! <[email protected]>
|