North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Wed Jun 08 02:49:38 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FYHuiw7Li5J2QU3WEbGnZ0an4unYjHWRGa85hjJGxoOygR+OwHdLFOSXuubsY4gnAjb3GJ3j9oy7kuHrel7MsoCuOlOcnEY6jEWoQzI4yvHt0hV70N8p6ds2V6cLwlfPD/R/9bXu7wCdr95OmsUej2P3EjhBPkO0qVGiaLpOrJo=
On 08/06/05, J.D. Falk <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>         We can't have reliable reputation until we know who the mail is
>         coming from -- so reliable identity is a necessary first step.
> 

What the doctor ordered seems to be something like an API that'd let
you plug dkim + csv into $mta

Anyone?

--srs
-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])