North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Internet Email Services Association ( wasRE: Why do so few mail providers su

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Wed Mar 02 00:05:01 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=U6CsZDAbXYwnRMPc94Dshg4PhfGOCsgrI2AgotJW+5liMeVaNtgXDQUjCd+XKNs3OLjdEZ9T3aMypGFcDJi8iFNYOPFY5JkYhk7uM2THTxQyZI8fQ3VKYsNg58yhEKcN7Kl/4dhicy6wmvoR4wFvRoY7n6wHdH507Fw7mN7Za9A=
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:01:35 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The agenda of the people who praise "email peering" is probably to
> change that.
> 
> "Should anyone be allowed to operate an email system? Perhaps not."
> 
> AOL postmaster Carl Hutzler

Where does that advocate email peering?  As long as you have

1. A static IP
2. Reasonable technical competence (clue being such a rare beast)

I dont see Carl, or anybody else, objecting

Cue rants about how some people shouldnt be allowed to have root,
enable or whatever on etch a sketches, let alone production machines.
You've seen such people and so have I ...

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])