|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: /24s run amuck
This was always a bad practice. One of the major networks to do this is Gone. Another had rewritten their policy to say something along the lines of "should advertise X amount of address space in aggregate or the equivalent". I don't think anyone still measures by prefixes alone. It was always the sign of cluelessness amongst those setting peering requirements. - Daniel Golding On 1/13/04 6:52 AM, "Patrick W.Gilmore" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote: > >>> and that a large driver is to >>> make your network look larger than it is... >>> >> >> What audience?? > > Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require things like > "Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes". :(
|