North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings

  • From: Petri Helenius
  • Date: Sat Sep 27 11:36:36 2003 
Brandon Butterworth wrote:
the it behaves well in varying network conditions, which cannot be said from either WM or RM.

Quality of the link from encoder to Real server is important, send
garbage to the server and it has nothing to distribute.


One can screw it up earlier than that, send garbage to the encoder and it spends 90%
of the available bandwidth encoding noise.

I get the impression it's done in band with other NANOG traffic and may
be suffering against the warez traffic.


Diffserv anyone?

Pete