North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Schwartz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:38 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution > Sensitivity: Confidential <snip> > > I think the whole idea of getting into an escalating > technical war with > Verisign is extremely bad. Your suggestion only makes sense if you expect > Verisign to make changes to evade technical solutions. Each such change by > Verisign will cause more breakage. Verisign will either provide a way to > definitively, quickly, and easily tell that a domain is not registered or > Verisign will badly break COM and NET. > > DS > Who said they're logical in their decision making process. While they experiment with .com/.net, countermeasures are called for. And they have badly broken .com/.net. This is just an evolution of the blackhole solution, doing it dynamically. Keeps us from having to find out they changed it/moved it/etc. And, if *.com goes away, so does the route :). > >
|