|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: C&W Peering
No, this is the part where I laugh at all of the people who told me this how wonderfully effecient Inter-provider settlement and 95th percentile billing are in the Internet today. Regards, James On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Vivien M. wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christopher A. Woodfield [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: June 4, 2001 7:55 PM > > To: John Starta > > Cc: Vivien M.; Mike Hughes; Sean Donelan; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: C&W Peering > > > > I don't think that this is going to be solved by C&W reversing > > themselves; > > I think PSI is going to have to get itself some transit, and quickly. > > Is this the part where the people (eg: Exodus, AboveNet are the two I can > think of immediately) who were forced to get themselves some transit because > PSI wouldn't peer with them anymore go and laugh at the irony of C&W pulling > a PSI on PSI themselves? > > Vivien > -- > Vivien M. > [email protected] > Assistant System Administrator > Dynamic DNS Network Services > http://www.dyndns.org/ > >
|