|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron
But if you take a look at the server itself (the log) it's not really load balancing, I use 'least conn' instead of 'round robin', and I thought the diff between 430 and 416 is just how many NIC card you can attach to the LD... -----Original Message----- From: Alberto Begliomini [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 11:11 PM To: Karyn Ulriksen Cc: 'Sutantyo, Danny'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron It depends which Local Director. The 430 is screaming fast and the 416 in conjunction with a 6509 and ASLB is very fast too. I have been using both solutions at customers sites with peak traffic of around a million hits per day. -- Alberto U. Begliomini Email: [email protected] Coldstone Consulting, LLC Phone: 650-400-3990 Security, Data Centers Design and Management Fax: 650-654-5938 Karyn Ulriksen wrote: > > > How about Local Director? > > Everyone I've spoke to about LD is very unhappy with it's performance. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Colella [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 5:38 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron > > Products are also available from Alteon, Cisco (Distributed > Director) and Resonate. Last time I looked, none of these > products does everything one wants, IMHO, but the set union > of features comes pretty close. > > --Richard > > > > > I believe BigIP has a product called DNS3 that serves a similar function. > > One of our ".com's" uses it to support their dual co-lo set-up. > > > > -TY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brantley Jones [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 10:06 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron > > > > > > > > At 09:28 PM 7/5/2000 -0400, you wrote: > > > > >they also have the dns based solution > > >available on serverirons. > > >-- > > >dima. > > > > Speaking of using a DNS proxy, does anybody know of anybody else doing > this > > besides Foundry?? > > > > Brantley > > > >
|