North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: route ingress
Sean M. Doran wrote: > Vadim Antonov [email protected]? writes: > > ? The only real solution is strong cryptographical authentication of > ? the ownership of routing prefixes. For some reason i do not see > ? any serious work in that direction being done. > > This would be much easier if we had a bottom-up > hierarchical addressing structure rather than the > current top-down one. I quite agree with that (though i'm not convinced that "bottom->top" allocation combined with recursive NATting is the best architecture). However, this does not preclude doing authentication with the current routing system. --vadim
|