North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs
Stephen Sprunk writes... > I think that the burden should be placed entirely on the spammer; there is > no reason to bother the user or the ISP with this mess. > > The current US law (USC Title 47 Sec 227) governing commercial > telecommunications should be strengthened to explicitly include email. Then all the spammers just migrate across the border. I already get spam from Canada and Europe. > Out of curiosity, has anyone considered the effect of this law (or others) > on non-profit spam? Or has anyone considered the effect of this law on spammers outside of the United States? -- Phil Howard KA9WGN +-------------------------------------------------------+ Linux Consultant | Linux installation, configuration, administration, | Milepost Services | monitoring, maintenance, and diagnostic services. | phil at milepost.com +-------------------------------------------------------+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|