North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
> An implementation that propagates _extra_ withdrawals shouldn't _hide_ > behind "standards compliant". In fact, I don't think _is_ either > "valid" or "standards compliant". There is no standard that says "send > extra BGP withdrawals for routes that you are not currently announcing". > It was just a bug in the implementation. Nice to know you understand the cause well enough to assign blame. Mind telling us all what it is? randy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|