North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East
Tim: 1) I'm Steve, not Richard. 2) Yes, I did find your analogy (which you admitted was "crude") to be offensive. That was my point. I really don't see the point of that sort of comment in a technical discussion. also... >From [email protected] Tue Oct 24 16:09:07 1995 >From: Tim Bass <[email protected]> >Message-Id: <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Initial Route Server Stats for MAE-East >To: [email protected] (Steven J. Richardson) >Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 16:06:08 -0400 (EDT) >Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] >In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Steven J. Richardson" at Oct 24, 95 12:59:40 pm >> >> >' make sure to put all the hair in your pants before >> > zipping your zipper..... notes ... SPAMtastic >> >> Is this really necessary? I don't see any technical point in this >> sort of argument. >> > >No, Richard, it is not 'really necessary'. I hope that you did not >find my crude analogy offensive. >I plead guilty to taking >my opinion to somewhat arrogant extremes in the above statement. >Furthermore, I made the mistake of thinking that this tread was on >com-priv. Ah... >If I had been more cognizant of the fact that this >discussion was on nanog, I would not have posted such a harsh >critique. > >My mistake, too quick on the elm keys, for sure. Thanks > >Regards, > >Tim Steve Richardson/Merit
|